The Catcher in the Rye—What was He Thinking?Nash K. Burger wrote a review of the book, The Catcher in the Rye, which waspublished in the New York Times on July 16, 1951. In his review, Burger idolizes thebook, calling it an unusually brilliant first novel.

Burger feels that this book haswonderful language and portrays the typical teenager. He thinks that Holden has acheerful disregard and that there is nothing wrong with him. He also feels that Holdensmistakes are not caused by him, but by the adult world. This book is totally opposite ofhow he categorizes it. In fact, Holden has is far from typical. The language he uses ispreposterous and he always jumps to assumptions.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

Burgers first thought that Holden is a typical teenager is way off. Typicalteenagers do not flunk out of school after school. An example of this is, They kicked meout. I wasnt supposed to come back after Christmas vacation on account of I wasflunking all four subjects and not applying myself and all.

Typical teenagers also do notgo and stay in a hotel and hire a hooker, When I opened the door, this prostitute wasstanding there. and then ask her, Dont you feel like talking for a while? The last thinghe does that is totally untypical of a teenager is to propose to a girl and then start callingher names. If this is someones idea of typical, they need to re-evaluate typical teenagelife. Next Burger says that the book is told in wonderful language. This book isabsolutely, without a doubt, filled with very vulgar language. There is absolutely nothingwonderful about Holdens language.

Every other thought that comes out of his head isfilled with curse words. A good example of this would be when he went to Phoebesschool and he found fuck you written on the wall. This is Holdens reaction to theprofanity, It drove me damn near crazy. I thought how Phoebe and all the other littlekids would see it, and how theyd wonder what the hell it meant, and then finally somedirty kid would tell them — all cockeyed, about it and maybe even worry about it for acouple of days. I kept wanting to kill whoeverd written it. I figured it was some pervertybum thatd sneaked in the school late at night to take a leak or something and then wroteit on the wall. I kept picturing myself catching him at it, and how Id smash his head onthe stone steps till he was good and goddam dead and bloody.

But I knew, too, Iwouldnt have the guts to do it. I knew that. That made me even more depressed. Ihardly even had the guts to rub it off the wall with my hand, if you want to know the truth. I was afraid some teacher would catch me rubbing it off and would think Id written it. But I rubbed it out anyway, finally. Then I went on up to the principals office.

(pg 201)It is obvious that there is nothing wonderful in Holdens language and it is aggravatingthat he uses this language and it is fine, but if someone else does, he wants to kill them.There is one thing that Burger is correct about. Burger says that Holden has atendency to judge people from too little evidence.

Holden categorizes people too muchwhen he says, Its full of phonies, and all you do is study so that you can learn enough tobe smart enough to be able to buy a goddam Cadillac some day, and you have to keepmaking believe you give a damn if the football team loses, and all you do is talk about girlsand liquor and sex all day, and everybody sticks together in these dirty little goddamcliques. The guys that are on the basketball team stick together, the Catholics sticktogether, the goddam intellectuals stick together. Even the guys that belong to thegoddam Book-of -the-Month Club stick together. l If you try to have a little intelligent– (page 131) Holden needs to not jump to so many conclusions and stereotype peoplebased on the actions of a few.Burger considers this book one of the best.

He says that it would be a long timebefore another young author would come out with such a great book. Burger iscompletely wrong. Holden is a tad off-base and does some really weird stuff.

This bookwas poorly written with too much detail. Salinger would get so caught up with detailsthat the book would bore you. This book should be taken off the high school reading list. Teachers ask us not to curse and then feed us the language throughout this book.