Being originated in India, the
Buddhist outlook has always been one of the most popular religions all over the
globe. Dissimilarly to the other religions, the philosophic thought of Buddhism
is mainly based on the teachings and their inner compound. Such a situation is
determined, as a rule, by the fact that the Buddhist approach is based on the
perception of human life on the foundation of reincarnation. This practice
helps to sustain the so-called timelessness of the teachings and explains the
fame of the religion in question. Such a vision of Buddhism is proper for both Theravada
Buddhism or the Mahayana Buddhism regardless of the numerous dissimilarities of
the two trends within the philosophic thought given. In addition to this, in
general, the essence of Buddhism is frequently dedicated to the fact that “Buddha’s
life is less important than their mythological and symbolic significance”
(Nadeau, 2014, p.143)

This endlessness, which Theravada
and Mahayana believe in, can presuppose oppositely different concepts. Predominantly,
for the Mahayana this endurance of being is personified via the great beings,
which are referred to as galactic and commanding mahasattvas. For the Mahayana, it is always possible to have manifold
Buddhas, who are thought to exist at the same time. In contrast to this
statement, the Theravada have another opinion, which goes totally apart from
the one by Mahayana. Another difference between these two trends of Buddhist
philosophy is the fact that one Buddha only exists. The most recent Buddha’s
reincarnation had had the form of Siddhartha Gautama. Nonetheless, one of the
most noteworthy discrepancy, which, as a rule, are observed between these trends
declared are the foundations, backgrounds, and foundation of their wisdoms. Though
the two Buddhism kinds promote wisdom, consideration and simplicity of anguish
in its teachings, this is generally committed via the following in commonplace
life, which is as a rule referred to as the holy Eightfold Path for the Theravada.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!


order now

The supporters of this teaching claim that it may be abridged to the procurement
of knowledge by having the Four Noble Truths (prajna) accommodated. They
include, herein, practicing having the mental self-control to advance the
awareness and body (samadhi) and the right conduct (sila) and. The Mahayana in
comparison is characterized by a respectable and honorable life. As a rule, it
is guided by the Five Precepts Compared to the Eightfold Path and the Four
Noble Truths of the Theravada. These are apparent from side of being guided by
their “great beings”. The latter ones possess certain customs, which seem to
have more apprehensions with the world in a more superior approach to its
vision. Hence, “the Mahayana tradition developed a great cosmic system of
multiple realms featuring mythical mountains, parallel worlds, layered
destinies of richly described heavens and hells” (Nadaeu, 2014, p.181)

The differences between the Mahayana
and the Theravada Buddhist practices and their essential distinctions and dominant
approaches to the transmission of the philosophic thoughts and teachings seem
to be totally new for me. The first time I heard of them is when I prepared and
started to write the current paper. If I am asked to point to the one which is
more preferable for me, I can state that the Theravada is more closer to me.

This is due to the fact that it is the most grounded trend which is closely
related to the reality of the contemporary world. As a consequence, I believe
that it is, then, easier to follow. What is more, I have a strong conviction
that they both are interesting as they possess their distinctive features.

However, the core of these teachings is advancement of compassion.