A) So If I was one of the board member I would have initially voted forthe proposal that a company can use a plant in Plainville, for 3 years to stablecompany’s production requirement while waiting for the establishment of newplant. This option was beneficial because the company has not need to worry aboutgetting any domestic license to run the business as giving domestic license toother then they might steal their ideas or technology.B) After the recess I would change my decision because it is a temporaryplant and it does not give permanent jobs to the employees.
Moreover if Byteproducts, tell the employees that this plant is just for 3 years no one wouldlike to work over there because as the population of the town is less thereforenew people will settle in this town with their families and if they came toknow that the plant is temporary they might never invest in this town.2. The board director should not be thinking only in the favor of overcomingcompany’s demand but also think about the community of Plainville after 3years. So the board of director first go to Plainville and do some research oneconomy of that town and what will happen if the plant closed.
3. Yes, the Byte executive tell the town administrators and its potentialemployees that it is temporary plant for 3 years and after this plant closedthey must have think for some other employment.4. So the alternative solution is that byte can do partnership with anothermanufacture to meet its demand until the new plant is built.5. I will postpone the vote and give some more time to select whichalternative is good. Moreover I will convince with Kevin Williams may be we findsome another good solution until the next meeting.
6. Poor forecasting and demand planning caused byte’s current facilitiesshortage. I think if they use time series forecasting technique this situation willnever happen.